An Interpretation of the Distinction between the Criterion for Ethics and Moral Education from Ayatollah Misbah's Viewpoint

Document Type : علمی پژوهشی

Author

Member of the Faculty of Philosophy of Ethics, ،The Research Center for the Encyclopedia of the Islamic intellectual Sciences Affiliated with The Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute, Qom

Abstract

Following the famous thinkers, Ayatollah Misbah considers the ethics to include moral education, but in his moral philosophy, he distinguishes between moral education and ethics. In his philosophy of ethics, he considers faith in God and belief in the resurrection to be the moral criterion, while he holds that the generosity of non-Muslims such as Hātam al-Ṭāʾī is valuable and will lead to a reduction in punishment. Considering that moral standard refers to the conditions necessary to reach the ultimate goal of morality, the generosity of Hātam al-Ṭāʾī as a non-believer should not have moral qualification and value; so what is the reason for reducing his punishment and what value can be considered for his generosity? With a new interpretation of Ayatollah Misbah's point of view in answering these questions, this research uses the distinction between ethics and moral education that are different at least in their aim, method, nature and criterion. Based on this distinction, the actions of infidels fails to qualify moral standards and lack moral value, while some of their actions may satisfy the standards and enjoy values of moral education. Ayatollah Misbah's view on moral education needs to be completed, and this article considers the criterion and standard of moral education as being the means for attaining nearness to God, and explains the goal of moral education in a way that the generosity of those like Hātam al-Ṭāʾī can enjoy the standard and value of moral education due to the goodness of the action.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aʻsam, ʻAbd al-Amīr. Rasāʾil Maniqīya fī al-Ḥudūd wa al-Rusūm. Beirut: Dār al-Manāhil, 1993/1413.
Bustānī, Fuʾād Afrām. Farhang Abjadī. translated by Riżā Mahyār, Tehran: Islāmī, 1997/1375.
Dāwūdī, Muḥammad. Tarbīyat Akhlāqī. Qum: Pazhūhishgāh Ḥawzah va Dānishgāh, Chāp-i Panjum, 2013/1391.
Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn Mukarram. Lisān al-ʿArab. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 2000/1378.
Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir ibn Muḥammad Taqī. Biḥār al-Anwār. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Tūrāth al-ʻArabī. 1983/1403.
Miṣbāḥ, Muḥammad Taqī. Akhlāq dar Qurān. Qum: ʾassisah-yi Āmūzishī  va Pazhūhishī Imām Khumiynī, 2010/1388.
Miṣbāḥ, Muḥammad Taqī. Āmūzish Falsafah. Qum: ʾassisah-yi Āmūzishī  va Pazhūhishī Imām Khumiynī, 2008/1386.
Miṣbāḥ, Muḥammad Taqī. bi Sūy Khudsāzī. Qum: ʾassisah-yi Āmūzishī  va Pazhūhishī Imām Khumiynī, 2002/1380.
Miṣbāḥ, Muḥammad Taqī. Durūs Falsafah-yi Akhlāq. Tehran: Iṭilāʻāt, 1995/1373.
Miṣbāḥ, Muḥammad Taqī. Falsafah-yi Akhlāq. Qum: ʾassisah-yi Āmūzishī  va Pazhūhishī Imām Khumiynī, 2010/1388.
Miṣbāḥ, Muḥammad Taqī. Insānsāzī dar Qurān. Qum: ʾassisah-yi Āmūzishī  va Pazhūhishī Imām Khumiynī, 2014/1392.
Miṣbāḥ, Muḥammad Taqī. Jalasih-yi Dahum Sukhanrānī Ishān dar Daftar Maqām Muʿaẓam Rahbarī. Dar Tārīkh 2018/1/3; 1396/10/13.
Miṣbāḥ, Muḥammad Taqī. Naqd va Barrisī Makātib Akhlāqī. Qum: ʾassisah-yi Āmūzishī  va Pazhūhishī Imām Khumiynī, 2006/1384.
Miṣbāḥ, Mujtabā. Bunyād Akhlāq. Qum: ʾassisah-yi Āmūzishī  va Pazhūhishī Imām Khumiynī, 2010/1388.
Muṭaharī, Murtażā. Majmūʿah-yi Āsār. Tehran: Ṣadrā. 2005/1384.
Narāqī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Mahdī. Miʿ rāj al-Saʿāda. Qum: Hijrat, 2008/1386.
Nūrī, Ḥusayn. Mustadrak al-Wasāʾil. Qum: Āl al-Biyt, 1988/1408.
CAPTCHA Image