Cosmological argument has been one of the most significant philosophical and theological arguments in religious traditions of different religions. In the western Theo-philosophical tradition, there have been both different interpretations and numerous criticisms presented about this argument. In this article, the most important of those arguments and their criticisms are both taken into consideration, and where necessary, the degree of validity of the criticisms has been pointed out, as well.
Keywords: Cosmo-philosophical, sufficient evidence, causality, prima cause, possibility.
Ḥusaynī Shāhrūdī, S. M. (2008). Cosmological Argument in the West. Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 40(2), -. doi: 10.22067/philosophy.v40i2.3169
MLA
Sayyid Murtaḍā Ḥusaynī Shāhrūdī. "Cosmological Argument in the West", Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 40, 2, 2008, -. doi: 10.22067/philosophy.v40i2.3169
HARVARD
Ḥusaynī Shāhrūdī, S. M. (2008). 'Cosmological Argument in the West', Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 40(2), pp. -. doi: 10.22067/philosophy.v40i2.3169
VANCOUVER
Ḥusaynī Shāhrūdī, S. M. Cosmological Argument in the West. Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 2008; 40(2): -. doi: 10.22067/philosophy.v40i2.3169
)
Send comment about this article