This article addresses one of Shahīd Muṭahharī’s philosophical innovations. He had declared that proving the matter is not possible without substantial motion and composition by way of unification. Also, argument through joining and separation is not valid in proving prime matter (hayūlā) and its acceptance by Ṣadrā has been erroneous. In this article, the first declaration is stated and proved and the second claim is refuted.
Keywords: matter, form, substantial motion, composition by way of unification, composition by way of annexation.
Kuhansāl, . (2011). Substance of Innovation in the Form of Argument. Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 43(1), -. doi: 10.22067/philosophy.v43i1.11273
MLA
‘Alīriḍā Kuhansāl. "Substance of Innovation in the Form of Argument", Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 43, 1, 2011, -. doi: 10.22067/philosophy.v43i1.11273
HARVARD
Kuhansāl, . (2011). 'Substance of Innovation in the Form of Argument', Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 43(1), pp. -. doi: 10.22067/philosophy.v43i1.11273
VANCOUVER
Kuhansāl, . Substance of Innovation in the Form of Argument. Essays in Philosophy and Kalam, 2011; 43(1): -. doi: 10.22067/philosophy.v43i1.11273
)
Send comment about this article