A Critical Look at Kant’s Ethics

Document Type : Original Article

Author

• Husayn Atrak

10.22067/philosophy.v42i2.11253

Abstract

Kant’s ethical theory is one the most important theories in philosophy of ethics, which has always attracted the attention of the commentators and critics. Although it has many positive points, there are some objections to this theory just as to any other human theory. In this article, it is attempted to point out the critiques that seem to have been leveled against Kant’s ethics. Some of these objections are: generalizability is a feature of the law rather than a criterion for the morality of action; prescription of improper actions and prohibition of proper actions by the criterion of generalizability; possibility of disagreement among people over regarding a rule as generalizable; non-efficiency of the principle of ends; objection to the innate value of intellect; objection to [regarding] the good intention as being only intrinsically good; objection to the absoluteness of ethical commands; the problem of the conflicting of duties; inattention to the personality, motives, and inner emotions of the doer and non-coverage of the entire moral life by the concept of duty.

Keywords

• ethics
• Kant
• duty
• critique
• principle of generalizability
• principle of ends

---

References

- اتکینسون، آر. اف؛ درآمدی بر فلسفه اخلاق، ترجمه سهراب علوی‌نیا، ترجمه و نشر کتاب، 1369.

- اونی، بروس؛ نظریه اخلاقی کانت، ترجمه علیرضا آل بویه، مؤسسه بوستان کتاب قم، 1381.

- راس، ویلیام دیوید؛ نظریه اخلاقی کانت، ترجمه محمد حسین کمالی نژاد، انتشارات حکمت، 1386.

- کانت، ایمانوئل؛ بنیاد مابعدالطبیعه اخلاق، ترجمه حمید عنایت و علی قیصری، انتشارات خوارزمی، 1369.

- کانت، ایمانوئل؛ مابعدالطبیعه اخلاق: مبانی مابعدالطبیعی تعلیم حق(فلسفه حقوق)، ترجمة منوچهر صانعی دره بیدی، تهران: انتشارات نقش و نگار، 1383 الف.

- کانت، ایمانوئل؛ مابعدالطبیعه اخلاق: مبانی مابعدالطبیعی تعلیم فضیلت (فلسفه فضیلت)، ترجمة منوچهر صانعی دره بیدی، تهران: انتشارات نقش و نگار، 1383ب.

- کورنر، اشتفان؛ فلسفه کانت، ترجمة عزت اله فولادوند، خوارزمی، 1367.

- مرداک، آیریس؛ سیطره خیر، ترجمة شیرین طالقانی، تهران: نشر شور، 1387.

- وارنوک، ‌مری؛ فلسفه اخلاق در قرن بیستم، ترجمة ابوالقاسم فنائی، بوستان کتاب قم، 1380.  

- Brant, Richard, A Critique of Kant, in Ethics, Julius R. Weinberg and Keith E. Yandell, publisher: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.

- Foot, Philippa, “Morality as a system of Hypothetical Imperative”, in “Moral Discourse and Practice”, ed. Stephen Darwall and Akkan Gibbard and Peter Railtion, Oxford University Press, 1997.

- Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of Metaphysic of Morals, Translated and analyzed by H. J. Paton, Harper and Row Publish, 1964.

- Kant, Immanuel, On A Supposed Right to tell Lies from Benevolent Motives, in the work called France, for the year 1797, Part VI. No. 1, on Political Reactions, by Benjamin Constant.

- Korsgaard, Christine “The Right to Lie: Kant on Dealing with Evil”, in “Ethical Theory” ed. James Rachels”, Oxford University Press, 1998.

- MacIntyre, Alasdair, “After Virtue”, second edition, University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.

- O’Connor OP, John, “Are Virtue ethics and Kantian ethics Really so very different?” in” Journal compilation”, Blackwell publishing, 2006.

- O’Neill, Onora, “Kantian ethics” in  Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward Craig, Routledge Publishing, 1998

- Paton, H. J., Some Common Misinterpretation of Kant, in Ethics, Weinberg and Yandell,

- Pojman, Louis. P., “Ethics, Discovering Right and Wrong”, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1999.